This article examines the problems of communication ethics based on the scientific heritage of Gadamer, one of the prominent theorists of hermeneutic philosophical views. Gadamer's considerations reveal complex aspects of speech ethics and social relations today and are also relevant because they have not lost their theoretical and practical significance. The article describes the important aspects of the analysis of arguments put forward for resolving communication conflicts and resolving them based on an effective approach through Gadamer's hermeneutic views.

hermeneutic thinking, Gadamer, cultural differences, communication norms, social relations, convergence of horizons, theory of interpretation, discourse norms, ethics.

Гадамер, Г.-Г. 1988. Истина и метод. — Москва: Прогресс, — б. 312.

Q.Nazarov [va boshq.]. 2018. Falsafa asoslari [Matn]: o‘quv qollanma - Toshkent: O‘zbekiston faylasuflari milliy jamiyati, - 84-bet.

Palmer, Richard (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. P.163

Gonzales, Francisco J. (2006). “Dialectic and Dialogue in the Hermeneutics of Paul Ricouer and H.G. Gadamer”. Continental Philosophy Review. 39 (1): p. 323.

Гадамер, Г.-Г. 1988. Истина и метод. — Москва: Прогресс, — б. 704

Gonzales, Francisco J. (2006). “Dialectic and Dialogue in the Hermeneutics of Paul Ricouer and H.G. Gadamer”. Continental Philosophy Review. 39 (1): p. 328.

Grünbaum, Adolf (1985). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. pp. 16-17.

Gonzales, Francisco J. (2006). “Dialectic and Dialogue in the Hermeneutics of Paul Ricouer and H.G. Gadamer”. Continental Philosophy Review. 39 (1): p. 323.