This article analyzes the legal force and nature of the decisions made by the Plenum of the Supreme Court. The decisions of the Plenum play a crucial role in ensuring the uniform interpretation and application of legal norms in judicial practice. The study examines the position of Plenum decisions within the system of regulatory legal acts, their impact on the activities of courts, and their role in ensuring the correct application of laws. Their legal force is analyzed based on regulatory frameworks, and the experience of other countries in this field is highlighted through the study of foreign expertise. The article emphasizes the importance of the Supreme Court Plenum decisions in developing judicial practice in a unified direction, eliminating contradictions in law enforcement, and effectively protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens.

Plenum of the Supreme Court, Plenum decision, legal force, judicial practice, regulatory legal acts, law enforcement practice, judicial power, interpretation of laws, judicial system, rule of law, regulatory decision.

Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi. (2023).

Normativ-huquqiy hujjatlar toʻgʻrisida. (2021). Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining Qonuni, OʻRQ-682

Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti. (2024). Konstitutsiyaviy huquq: Darslik. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Adliya vazirligi.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi. (2021, 28-iyul). Sudlar to‘g‘risida (O‘RQ-703-sonli Qonun). O‘zbekiston Respublikasi qonun hujjatlari ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi.

Khakimov, B. (2023). The decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan – a means of unification of judicial practice. Tashkent State University of Law.

Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Rossiya Federatsiyasi Konstitutsiyasi]. (1993). Rossiyskaya Gazeta.

Kornev, A. V. (2012). Raz’yasneniya plenumov vysshikh sudov po voprosam sudebnoy praktiki kak spetsificheskaya forma sudebnogo pravotvorchestva v Rossii [Clarifications of the plenums of higher courts on judicial practice as a specific form of judicial law-making in Russia]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskiye nauki, (4), 18–26.

Samsonov, N. V. (2019). Resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as a source of civil procedural law. Russian Law Journal, 7(2), 120–135.

Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (1995). Official website of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Akorda.

Rysjanova, G. S., Akhmet, B., & Abdrassulov, Y. B. (2025). Teoriya voprosa sudebnogo pravotvorchestva i normativnykh postanovleniy Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakhstan [Qozog‘iston Respublikasi Oliy sudining normativ qarorlari va sud huquq ijodkorligi masalasi nazariyasi]. Vestnik Instituta zakonodatel’stva i pravovoy informatsii RK, 80(3), 27–33.

Zhaksylykuly, T. (2013). Correlation of normative resolutions with normative legal acts in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Rocznik Polsko-Wschodni, 15, 21–30.

Абдуллаева, М. М. (2023). Суднинг ҳуқуқни шарҳлаш ҳужжатлари конституциявий назорат объекти сифатида. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари, 3(7). https://doi.org/10.47390/1342V3IlY2023N7

Жуйков, В. М. (1999). Роль разъяснений Пленума Верховного Суда Российской Федерации в обеспечении единства судебной практики и защиты прав человека. В Комментарий к постановлениям Пленума Верховного Суда Российской Федерации по гражданским делам (с. 5–23). Юристъ.

Choriyev, U. R. (2025). Sud pretsedenti tushunchasining nazariy-huquqiy asoslari. Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture, 3(9), 472–476. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17514137

Yodgorov, M. F. (2022). Role of decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan in criminal court proceedings. Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal, 3(9), 471–476.

Kwiatkowski, Z. (2010). Legal nature of the Supreme Court resolutions. Review of Comparative Law, 15(2), 45–62.