Articles
| Open Access |
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojhpl-06-08-17
EFFECTIVE METHODS OF TARGETED WORK WITH INDIVIDUALS PRONE TO RADICAL VIEWS: A SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS
Iroda Shokhitbekovna Akhmedova ,Abstract
This article analyzes the socio-philosophical foundations and practical methods of targeted work with individuals who are inclined toward radical views. Targeted work is understood not as placing a person into a predetermined “risk group,” but as a comprehensive process of examining the individual’s life situation, social relations, needs, views, and behavioral risks. The article provides a comparative analysis of such methods as individual assessment, trust-based communication, motivational interviewing, work with families, religious and ideological counseling, support in education and employment, prevention in the digital environment, mentoring, and interagency cooperation.
Keywords
radicalization, targeted prevention, social philosophy, individual approach, motivational interviewing, family, religious counseling, social inclusion, digital environment, deradicalization.
References
Schmid, A. P. (2013). Radicalisation, de-radicalisation, counter-radicalisation: A conceptual discussion and literature review. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. https://doi.org/10.19165/2013.1.02
Horgan, J. (2008). Deradicalization or disengagement? A process in need of clarity and a counterterrorism initiative in need of evaluation. Perspectives on Terrorism, 2(4), p - 3–8.
Wolfowicz, M., Litmanovitz, Y., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. “Cognitive and Behavioral Radicalization: A Systematic Review of the Putative Risk and Protective Factors.” p – 88-101
Veldhuis, T. (2012) Designing Rehabilitation and Reintegration Programmes for Violent Extremist Offenders. p – 94-107
Clark, M. D. (2019) “Motivational Interviewing for Deradicalization: Increasing the Readiness to Change.” Journal for Deradicalization. p - 47–74
Koehler, D. (2017) Understanding Deradicalization: Methods, Tools and Programs for Countering Violent Extremism. p - 87-95
Zych, I., Nasaescu, E. (2022) “Is Radicalization a Family Issue? A Systematic Review of Family-Related Risk and Protective Factors, Consequences and Interventions.” p - 92-99
Ashour, O. (2009) The De-Radicalization of Jihadists: Transforming Armed Islamist Movements. p – 54-67
El-Said, H. (2015) .New Approaches to Countering Terrorism: Designing and Evaluating Counter Radicalization and De-Radicalization Programs. p – 3-24
Achilov, D., Shaykhutdinov, R. (2013) “State Regulation of Religion and Radicalism in the Post-Communist Muslim Republics.” Problems of Post-Communism. p – 18-44
Зубок, Ю. А., Чупров, В. И. (2008) “Экстремизм среди молодежи.” Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. c – 37-38
Sharipova, D., & Beissembayev, S. (2021). Causes of Violent Extremism in Central Asia: The Case of Kazakhstan. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, p - 1-21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349695373_Causes_of_Violent_Extremism_in_Central_Asia_The_Case_of_Kazakhstan
Albadi, N, Kurdi, M, Mishra, S. (2022) “Deradicalizing YouTube: Characterization, Detection, and Personalization of Religiously Intolerant Arabic Videos.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3555618
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Iroda Shokhitbekovna Akhmedova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.