Articles
| Open Access |
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojhpl-05-11-04
THE ROLE OF NEOCONSERVATIVE THINK TANKS IN SHAPING U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGIES (LATE 20TH – EARLY 21ST CENTURY)
Abrar Salokhiddinovich Turayev ,Abstract
This scholarly article analyzes the influence of neoconservative think tanks on the formation of U.S. national security strategies at the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries. Think tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), The Heritage Foundation, Project for the New American Century (PNAC) and the Hudson Institute played a crucial role in promoting military supremacy, the spread of global democratic values, the doctrine of preemptive strike and aggressive foreign policy in U.S. foreign affairs. The national security strategies shaped by their analyses exhibit skepticism towards arms control treaties, emphasize counterterrorism, energy security, domestic security, and international security with novel approaches. The article highlights the philosophical and strategic ideas of neoconservative think tanks and their integration into practical policies, illustrating their impact on maintaining U.S. global leadership and ensuring national security.
Keywords
neoconservatism, national security strategy, American Enterprise Institute (AEI), The Heritage Foundation, Project for the New American Century (PNAC), Hudson Institute, preemptive strike doctrine, counterterrorism, arms control, energy security, domestic security, U.S. foreign policy, strategic documents.
References
McGann J.G. Think Tanks and Policy Advice in the US: Academics, Advisors and Advocates. – London: Routledge, 2021. – P.158-159.
Abelson D.E. A Capitol Idea: Think Tanks and US Foreign Policy. – Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006. – P.92.
Влияние А. Уолстеттера на разработку неоконсерваторами внешней политики и стратегии национальной безопасности США //https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-a-uolstettera-na-razrabotku-neokonservatorami-vneshney-politiki-i-strategii-natsionalnoy-bezopasnosti-ssha/viewer
Steinberg, J. Leo Strauss, Fascist Godfather of the Neo-Cons // Executive Intelligence Review. – 2003. – March 21. – P.14.
Krepinevich, A. F. The Pentagon’s Wasting Assets: Defense Spending and Military Capabilities. – Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2009. – P.30.
McGann, J. G. Think Tanks and Policy Advice in the US: Academics, Advisors and Advocates. – London: Routledge, 2021. – P.158
National Security Strategy of the United States. – Washington, D.C.: The White House, 1987. – 40 p.
Mandate for Leadership: Policy Management in a Conservative Administration / Heritage Foundation. – Washington, D.C., 1981. – 1040 p.
Пахалюк К.А. Основания политики национальной безопасности США при Дж. У. Буше-младшем (идеология, концепция, приоритеты) // Власть. –2015. –№9. –С.123-128. // https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osnovaniya-politiki-natsionalnoy-bezopasnosti-ssha-pri-dzh-u-bushe-mladshem-ideologiya-kontseptsiya-prioritety
Hudson Institute. Energy Security and U.S. National Interests. Washington, D.C., 2003. – P.25.
American Enterprise Institute. Energy Policy and National Security. Washington, D.C., 2005. – P.48.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abrar Salokhiddinovich Turayev

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.