The article examines the legal mechanisms ensuring control over the living conditions of a child after international adoption. A comparative analysis of the legislation and practices of Germany, France, and several CIS countries, including Uzbekistan, is conducted. The study identifies key issues in post-adoption monitoring and proposes recommendations for improving national and international control mechanisms.

international adoption, post-adoption monitoring, child rights protection, 1993 Hague Convention, Germany, France, CIS, Uzbekistan.

Convention of 29 May 1993 on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption. Hague Conference on Private International Law.

Guide to Good Practice under the Hague Convention (Guidelines on post-adoption services). HCCH.

Le suivi post-adoption — site Agence française de l’adoption / Ministère des Solidarités et de la Santé.

Europarl / Role of the Jugendamt and German youth welfare system; Germany intercountry adoption (US State Dept overview).

ISS/IRC — Fiche de formation N°46: Le suivi post-adoption.

Oxford review — Post-adoption support and interventions (Selwyn et al.).

Uzbekistan: Adoption procedure — official education portal and US Embassy guidance.

Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, 1993

Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH). Guide to Good Practice No. 1: The Implementation and Operation of the 1993 Hague Convention, 2008.

Bartholet E. International Adoption: The Human Rights Position. Global Policy, 2020, Vol. 11, No. 2.

Международная социальная служба (ISS). Рекомендации по постадопционному сопровождению. Женева, 2017.