Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojhpl-05-11-56

A COMPARATIVE-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE NECESSITY TO INTRODUCE THE CONCEPT OF “CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT” INTO THE CRIMINAL LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN

Anvar Kurbonov ,

Abstract

The article discusses the distinctive features of the institutions of administrative prejudice and criminal misconduct, which are significant in the liberalization of criminal legislation. It provides a brief overview of the advantages and disadvantages of these two institutions. In this regard, the legislation of foreign countries and the views of research scholars are comparatively analyzed from a legal perspective. Furthermore, administrative prejudice concerning certain offenses and criminal misconducts in the Republic of Uzbekistan are examined based on statistical data. At the conclusion of the study, the author’s opinions and conclusions regarding the introduction of the institution of criminal misconduct into the criminal legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan are briefly presented.

Keywords

offense, crime, criminal misconduct, administrative prejudice, code, punishment, penalization, imprisonment, deprivation of liberty, justice.

References

Kholikov F.U. “Issues of qualification of the act with the norms of the criminal code with administrative prejudice”. universum: economy and law. №6 (105). June 2023. https://7universum.com/pdf/economy/6(105)%20[21.05.2023]/Kholiko.pdf

Volzhenkin B.V., Principle of justice and problemy mnojestvennosti prestupleniy po UK RF / B.V. Volzhenkin // Zakonnost. - M., - 1998 - No. 12 - S. 2-7; Kovalev M.I., Prestuplenie i prostupok / M.I.Kovalev // Problemy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatelstva po ekrepleniyu pravoporyadka i usilenie borby s pravonarushenyami: mejvuz. sb. Nauch. tr. Sverdlovsk: Izd-vo Sverdl. walk in-ta, – 1982 – S. 3–14.

Lopashenko N. A. “There is no administrative prejudice in criminal law!” Bulletin of the Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation, 2011, No. 3 (23), 64 71.

Malkov V. P. “Administrative prejudice: pros and cons.” Bulletin of the Academy of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, 2011, No. 3 (23), 58 64.

Lapina M.A., Truncevski Y., Karpukhin D.V. (2015). Administrative issue preclusion as a way of decriminalization of criminal offences and distinction between criminal offences and administrative offences. NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice, 2, 24–56. https://doi.org/10.7256/2306-9945.2015.2.15899

Qozog‘iston Respublikasi Jinoyat kodeksi. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575252

Germaniya Federativ Respublikasi Jinoyat kodeksi. https://constitutions.ru/?p=24969

Fransiya Respublikasi Jinoyat kodeksi. https://constitutions.ru/?p=25017

Ukraina Respublikasi Jinoyat kodeksi. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30418109&pos=603;-56#pos=603;-56

Rossiya Federatsiyasi Jinoyat kodeksi. https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699/

Ozarbayjon Respublikasi Jinoyat kodeksi. https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30420353#pos=579;-56

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Kurbonov, A. . (2025). A COMPARATIVE-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE NECESSITY TO INTRODUCE THE CONCEPT OF “CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT” INTO THE CRIMINAL LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN. Oriental Journal of History, Politics and Law, 5(11), 456–469. https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojhpl-05-11-56