This article analyses the socio-philosophical meaning of the reintegration of radicalised individuals into society. Reintegration is not merely a security measure or a process of providing employment to a former prisoner. It entails restoring an individual’s place in society, social relationships, legal status, and confidence in the future. The article argues that effective reintegration should combine an individualised approach, engagement with the family, education and employment support, psychological assistance, religious counselling, local community participation, and long-term follow-up. Viewing an individual solely as a source of risk may lead to their further alienation from society. Therefore, reintegration should be based on a balance between security, human dignity, social justice, and civic responsibility.

radicalisation, deradicalisation, reintegration, rehabilitation, social alienation, stigma, social recognition, civic identity, social capital, security.

Horgan, J. (2008). “Deradicalization or disengagement? A process in need of clarity and a counterterrorism initiative in need of evaluation.” Perspectives on Terrorism, 2(4), p - 3–8

T. Veldhuis. Designing Rehabilitation and Reintegration Programmes for Violent Extremist Offenders: A Realist Approach, International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, 2012, https://doi.org/10.19165/2012.1.02.

E. Goffman. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, Prentice-Hall. p – 18-32

R. D. Putnam. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster. p – 18-33

A. Sen. (1999) Development as Freedom. p – 22-28

P. Bertelsen. (2015) “Danish Preventive Measures and Deradicalization Strategies: The Aarhus Model” p - 241–253.

D. Kyoler (2017). Understanding Deradicalization: Methods, Tools and Programs for Countering Violent Extremism, Routledge. p – 24-29

J. Horgan va K. Breddok (2010) “Rehabilitating the Terrorists? Challenges in Assessing the Effectiveness of De-radicalization Programs”, Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(2), 2010, pp. 267–291, https://doi.org/10.1080/09546551003594748.

K. Bousek. (2008) “Counter-Terrorism from Within: Assessing Saudi Arabia’s Religious Rehabilitation and Disengagement Programme”, RUSI Journal, 153(6), , pp. 60–65, https://doi.org/10.1080/03071840802670106.

U. Ashur. (2009) The De-Radicalization of Jihadists: Transforming Armed Islamist Movements, Routledge. P- 37-44

V. V. Krasinskiy, “Ресоциализация (дерадикализация, реабилитация и реинтеграция) лиц, возвращённых из зон вооружённых конфликтов”, Современное право, 2021, № 8, с. 102–113.

A. S. Yayla. (2020) “Preventing Terrorist Recruitment through Early Intervention by Involving Families”, Journal for Deradicalization. pp. 1–39.

B. Vidya (2020) “Deradicalization in Indonesia: Implementation and Challenge”, Journal of Terrorism Studies, 2(1). Article 3. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jts/vol2/iss1/3/

D. Achilov va R. Shayxutdinov (2013) “State Regulation of Religion and Radicalism in the Post-Communist Muslim Republics”, Problems of Post-Communism, 60(5), pp. 17–33, https://doi.org/10.2753/PPC1075-8216600502.

Sh. M. Mirziyoyev, BMT Bosh Assambleyasining 78-sessiyasidagi nutq, 2023-yil 20-sentabr, O‘zbekiston https://president.uz/oz/lists/view/6679