Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojhpl-06-09-73

SOURCE-CRITICAL APPROACHES TO THE MANUSCRIPT AND COMMENTARY TRADITION OF HAFIZ AL-DIN AL-NASAFI’S KANZ AL-DAQA’IQ

Nurillo Masidikovich Yuldashev ,

Abstract

The article examines source-critical approaches to the manuscript and commentary tradition of Hafiz al-Din al-Nasafi’s Kanz al-Daqa’iq. The study aims to develop criteria for describing copies, separating the base text from commentaries and glosses, and assessing how textual variants affect the meaning of fiqh rules. The author’s dissertation materials, critical and commentary editions and catalogue records from Uzbekistan and Tatarstan were analysed using historical source-critical, comparative textual and typological methods. It argues that manuscripts, lithographs, lithographs with handwritten annotations, commentary editions and joint editions of commentary and gloss must be described as distinct objects, and proposes a typology of them. It shows that the date recorded for one lithographed copy does not match the known period of activity of the New Bukhara press. The role of Tabyin al-Haqa’iq and al-Bahr al-Ra’iq in explaining terse formulations and establishing readings is examined. Using the qarya/qurba variant and the omission of the delivery-place condition in the chapter on salam, the article shows that a textual difference can change the content of a legal rule. A six-stage research procedure, from identifying a copy to a justified translation, is proposed; the findings can improve collection catalogues and support translating the work into Uzbek.

Keywords

Hafiz al-Din al-Nasafi, Kanz al-Daqa’iq, Hanafi fiqh, source criticism, textual criticism, manuscript, lithograph, commentary and gloss, textual variant.

References

Hallaq W. B. Sharī‘a: Theory, Practice, Transformations. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Муминов А. К. Ханафитский мазхаб в истории Центральной Азии / под ред. С. М. Прозорова. – Алматы: Қазақ энциклопедиясы, 2015. – 400 с.

Юлдашев Н. М. «Канз-уд-дакаик» Хафизуддина ан-Насафи как источник по фикху имущественных отношений в ханафитском мазхабе: дис. … д-ра философии (PhD) по исламоведческим наукам. – Ташкент, 2026.

an-Nasafī, Abū al-Barakāt. Kanz al-daqā’iq fī al-fiqh al-ḥanafī / dirāsa wa taḥqīq Sā’id Bakdāsh. – Bayrūt; al-Madīna al-Munawwara: Dār al-Bashā’ir al-Islāmiyya; Dār al-Sirāj, 2011. – 723 p.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2017-yil 24-maydagi “Qadimiy yozma manbalarni saqlash, tadqiq va targ‘ib qilish tizimini yanada takomillashtirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida”gi PQ-2995-son qarori. – URL: https://lex.uz/docs/3211987

Rosenthal F. The Technique and Approach of Muslim Scholarship. – Rome: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum, 1947. – (Analecta Orientalia; 24).

Déroche F., Berthier A., Guesdon M.-G., et al. Islamic Codicology: An Introduction to the Study of Manuscripts in Arabic Script / transl. D. Dusinberre, D. Radzinowicz. – London: Al-Furqān Islamic Heritage Foundation, 2006.

Gacek A. Arabic Manuscripts: A Vademecum for Readers. – Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2009. – (Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 1; vol. 98).

Görke A., Hirschler K. (eds.). Manuscript Notes as Documentary Sources. – Beirut: Orient-Institut; Würzburg: Ergon, 2011. – (Beiruter Texte und Studien; 129).

Witkam J. J. Establishing the stemma: fact or fiction? // Manuscripts of the Middle East. – 1988. – Vol. 3. – P. 88–101.

El Shamsy A. Rediscovering the Islamic Classics: How Editors and Print Culture Transformed an Intellectual Tradition. – Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.

Shcheglova O. P. Lithography iii. In Central Asia // Encyclopaedia Iranica Online. – 2009. – URL: https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/lithography-iii-in-central-asia/ (murojaat sanasi: 09.11.2026)

az-Zayla‘ī, Fakhr al-Dīn ‘Uthmān ibn ‘Alī. Tabyīn al-ḥaqā’iq sharḥ Kanz al-daqā’iq wa bi-hāmishihi Ḥāshiyat al-Shilbī. – Būlāq: al-Maṭba‘a al-Kubrā al-Amīriyya, 1313–1315 h. – 6 vols.

Ibn Nujaym, Zayn al-Dīn. al-Baḥr al-rā’iq sharḥ Kanz al-daqā’iq wa-maʻahu Takmilat al-Baḥr al-rā’iq li-l-Ṭūrī wa bi-hāmishihi Minḥat al-khāliq li-Ibn ‘Ābidīn. – 2nd ed. – al-Qāhira: Dār al-Kitāb al-Islāmī, [s. a.]. – 8 vols.

Насруллаев Н. Ҳ. Ўзбекистондаги Шарқ қўлёзма манбалари сақланаётган масканлар ҳақида // Oriental Journal of History, Politics and Law. – 2026. – Vol. 6, № 3. – Б. 26–35. – DOI: 10.37547/supsci-ojhpl-06-03-05.

Сборник тонкостей мусульманского права [Электронный ресурс] // Центр письменного и музыкального наследия ИЯЛИ им. Г. Ибрагимова АН РТ. – URL: https://miras.info/projects/mirasxane/manuscript/346-sbornik-tonkostej-musulmanskogo-prava.html

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Yuldashev, N. M. . (2026). SOURCE-CRITICAL APPROACHES TO THE MANUSCRIPT AND COMMENTARY TRADITION OF HAFIZ AL-DIN AL-NASAFI’S KANZ AL-DAQA’IQ. Oriental Journal of History, Politics and Law, 6(09), 717–729. https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojhpl-06-09-73