Articles
| Open Access |
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojp-06-06-01
CONVERSIVE RELATIONS OF QUESTION AND ANSWER VERBS IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
Ziyodakhon Ravshanovna Mamatova ,Abstract
The article analyzes converse-like semantic relations between English verbs of questioning and answering, primarily ask–answer, as well as question–reply and inquire–respond. The analysis focuses on participant roles, argument alternation, direction of the speech act, and presuppositional dependence. The findings show that ask and answer are not strict converses of the buy–sell type because an act of asking does not logically entail an act of answering. At the same time, the use of answer normally presupposes a preceding question or request. The pair is therefore interpreted as a functional-oppositional relation displaying features of communicative converseness.
Keywords
English, questioning verbs, answering verbs, ask, answer, converse relation, lexical semantics, communicative event, presupposition, antonymy.
References
Cruse A. A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006. P. 39–40.
Murphy M. L. Semantic Relations and the Lexicon: Antonymy, Synonymy and Other Paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Saeed J. I. Semantics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
Kroeger P. R. Analyzing Meaning: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. 2nd corrected and slightly revised ed. Berlin: Language Science Press, 2019. P. 111–112.
Jones S., Murphy M. L., Paradis C., Willners C. Antonyms in English: Construals, Constructions and Canonicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Lyons J. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.
Staal J. F. Some Semantic Relations between Sentoids // Foundations of Language. 1967. Vol. 3, No. 1. P. 66–88.
Fillmore C. J. The Case for Case // Universals in Linguistic Theory / eds. E. Bach, R. T. Harms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968. P. 1–88.
Апресян Ю. Д. Избранные труды. Т. I: Лексическая семантика. Синонимические средства языка. 2-е изд., испр. и доп. М.: Языки русской культуры; Восточная литература РАН, 1995. 472 с.
Подкорытова А. В. Ономасиологические модели конверсных девербативов со значением абстрактного действия // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2017. № 4-2.
Зифф П. Несинонимичность активных и пассивных предложений // Сборник переводов по вопросам информационной теории и практики. 1970. № 16. С. 66–72.
Chafe W. L. Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
Пешковский А. М. Русский синтаксис в научном освещении. 8-е изд., доп. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2001. 510 с.
Уфимцева А. А. Слово в лексико-семантической системе языка. М.: Наука, 1968.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ziyodakhon Ravshanovna Mamatova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.