Just as there is nothing in the world that does not develop, language also continues to develop day by day. On one hand, language as a social phenomenon is evolving continuously; on the other hand, the field that studies this phenomenon is rapidly advancing as well. It is clear to everyone that language — the object of linguistics — is both extremely complex and invaluable, because all knowledge is ultimately based on language.

Every language has its own unique characteristics, and these linguistic features are closely connected with culture. In this regard, we can say that a nation’s general worldview manifests itself in the specific features of linguistics. Semantics, or semasiology, studies and analyzes the meanings of words and expressions in linguistics. In other words, it is the field that examines what meanings words convey in speech or writing.

This article attempts to study the semantic and linguocultural analysis of lexical units of the language and investigates the relationships between different levels of the language. The main focus is directed at the lexical level of the language. Indeed, every theory that exists in linguistics is primarily based on the way we understand language. How we understand language plays an important role in shaping linguistic theory.

language, lexical level, linguistics, branches of linguistics, lexical-semantic level, lexicology, linguoculturology, color-component lexical units.

Wierzbicka A. Semantics, Culture, and Cognition. Oxford University Press. 1992.-p.441

Wierzbicka A. Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.- 1997.-p.317

Телия В.Н. Русская фразеология: семантико-прагматический и лингвокультурологический аспекты. М.: ЯРК, 1996, 284с Телия В.Н. Фразеология в контексте культуры. М., Русский язык. 1999.

Маслова В.А. Лингвокультурология. Учебное пособие. М.: Академия, 2001.-154с

Гумбольдт В. Избранные труды по языкознания.-М.: Прогресс, 1984.-397с. Гумбольдт В. Язык и философия культуры. М.: Прогресс, 1985.- 450с Добровольский Д. О. Национально-культурная специфика во фразеологии (II) // ВЯ. No 6.1998.-С.48-57 Жуков В.П. Семантика фразеологических оборотов. – М.: Просвещение, 1978. – 160 с. Иванова С. Лингвокултурологический аспект исследование языковых единиц. Уфа.-2003

Маматов А.Э. Ҳозирги замон ўзбек адабий тилида лексик ва фразеологик норма муаммолари. – Тошкент: 1991.-Б.218

Йўлдошев Б. Фразеологик услубият асослари. Ўқув қўлланмаси. Самарқанд: самду нашри. 1998.-200 б

Azizov O. A. Tilshunoslikka kirish. Toshkent. 1963.

Buronov J. B. Ingliz va uzbek tillari kiyosiy grammatikasi. Toshkent, 1973. 144-bet

Lingvokulturologiya, ma’ruza matnlari, darvishov ibrohim o`rmonovich. Namangan 2020

Musulmonova shokhruza, a comparative analysis of phraseological units in uzbek and english languages, vol. 45 no. 1 (2025): лучшие интеллектуальные исследования | часть-45 | том-1 https://scientific-jl.com/luch/article/view/14274

Elvina Rustemovna Sherefetdinova. (2024). In intercultural contexts, social norms, beliefs, and values play a significant role in shaping interpretations and interactions. Kokand University Research Base, 112–123. Retrieved from https://scholar.kokanduni.uz/index.php/rb/article/view/297

Elvina Rustemovna Sherefetdinova. (2024). Globalization and the shifting sands of cultural identity. Kokand University Research Base, 124–127. Retrieved from https://scholar.kokanduni.uz/index.php/rb/article/view/298

Nodira, R., Mubina, K., Gulyora, I., Robiyaxon, A., & Shahzodaxon, R. (2025, June). The connection between hemingway’s life and his fiction. In conference of advance science & emerging technologies (Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 82-86).

Nodira, R., & Muhabbatxon, Y. (2025, June). The influence of ts eliot on post-war literature. In conference of modern science & pedagogy (Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 217-223).

Rajabaliyeva, N. (2024). Phraseological units with color components and their importance in english language. Qo‘qon universiteti xabarnomasi, 13, 331–334. Https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v13i.1091.