Articles
| Open Access |
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojp-05-07-11
MAIN ASPECTS OF STUDYING THE EVALUATIVE COMPONENT OF PAREMIOLOGICAL FUND IN THE RESEARCHED LANGUAGES
Zarina Kurbonova ,Abstract
This article examines the cognitive-semantic and axiological foundations of evaluation in language, with a particular focus on the evaluative potential of lexical units and proverbs within informal discourse. Drawing on the works of M.V. Nikitin, E.S. Aznurova, N.D. Arutyunova, V.N. Telia, A.A. Ivin, J. Searle, A. Wierzbicka, and other scholars, the study explores how evaluative meanings emerge as integral components of human cognition and linguistic activity. The paper argues that evaluation constitutes a fundamental mental operation that shapes an individual’s worldview, cultural identity, and communicative behavior. Proverbs and paremiological units, due to their ethnospecific and metaphorical nature, serve as culturally marked carriers of positive, negative, and neutral evaluations. Their semantic structure reflects collective value systems and enables cross-cultural comparison of national linguocultures. The research highlights two major types of linguistic values—socially and culturally shaped evaluations and binary oppositional value scales (good/bad, pleasant/unpleasant, etc.). Theoretical perspectives from classical philosophy (Aristotle, Hobbes, Locke, Spinoza) and modern linguistic axiology illustrate the multidimensional nature of evaluation, encompassing psychological, emotional, pragmatic, and cognitive factors. Overall, the study demonstrates that evaluative semantics plays a central role in understanding how language encodes cultural values, shapes communicative intentions, and contributes to constructing a nation’s linguistic picture of the world
Keywords
evaluation, evaluative semantics, linguistic axiology, cognitive linguistics, pragmatics, proverbs, paremiology, informal discourse, value system, lexical connotation, cultural worldview, anthropocentrism, linguistic culture.
References
Arutyunova, N. D. (1988). Logika, yazyk, kultura. Moscow: Nauka.
Ayer, A. J. (1963). Language, Truth and Logic. London: Gollancz.
Aznurova, E. S. (1984). Semantika otsenki v leksike. Kazan University Press.
Baranov, A. N., Wolf, E. M. (2002). Otsenochnye smysly v yazyke. Moscow: Nauka.
Beletskaya, A. Y. (2000). Paremiological axiological structures in modern languages.
Bragina, N. G. (1996). Otsenochnye sredstva v sovremennom yazyke. Moscow.
Dobridneva, Y. A. (2000). Otsenochnye kategorii v strukture nominativnykh edinits.
Frenkel, V. A. (1982). Otsenka i znachenie. Leningrad University Press.
Locke, J. (1975). Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford University Press.
Spinoza, B. (1957). Ethics. Moscow: Publishing House of Foreign Literature.
Stevenson, Ch. (1964). Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Telia, V. N. (1996). Russkaya frazeologiya: semantika, pragmatika, kultura. Moscow: Nauka.
Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, Culture, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zarina Kurbonova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.