This article presents a linguocultural analysis of nominative structures through a comparative study of English, Russian, and Uzbek. It explores the morphosyntactic, semantic, and pragmatic dimensions of the nominative case across typologically diverse languages. Key phenomena discussed include subject encoding, multiple nominative constructions, experiencer-subject alignments, and the re-conceptualization of case assignment via a predicate-based model. The study also highlights how complex nominative units emerge through word formation, compounding, and lexicalization, reflecting language-specific strategies in conceptualizing experience and discourse structuring.                                                                                                                            

nominative case, linguoculturology, inflectional language, agglutinative language, syntax, morphology, subject, predication, pragmatics, lexicology.

Adams, V. (2014). Complex words in English. Routledge.

Adams, V. (2016). An introduction to modern English word-formation. Routledge

Lee, C., Kim, Y. W., & Yi, B. U. (2021). Numeral Classifiers and Classifier Languages. Routledge.; Cho, J. (2024). Nominative Objects in Psych Verb Constructions: Formal and Experimental Approaches. University of Delaware.

이재모. (2021). Nominative Case Assignment by Phase: A Predication-Based Approach (Doctoral dissertation, 서울대학교 대학원).

Roussou, A. (1994). The syntax of complementisers. University of London, University College London (United Kingdom).; Postal, P. M., & Pullum, G. K. (1978). Traces and the description of English complementizer contraction. Linguistic Inquiry, 9(1), 1-29.

Abduraimovna, A. S., & Bekmuratovna, B. Y. (2024, November). Nemis va rus tili ijtimoiy-siyosiy leksikasida neologizmlar. In interdiscipline innovation and scientific research conference (Vol. 3, No. 25, pp. 122-124).

Ahmedova, H., & Yuldashaliyeva, M. (2025). Aforizmlarning ta'rifi, belgilari, farqlari, kelib chiqishi va rivojlanishi haqida ba’zi mulohazalar. Академические исследования в современной науке, 4(10), 94-98.

Boboyeva, M. X. (2021). Predloglarning gapdagi o’rni va qo’llanilishi. Экономика и социум, (11-1 (90)), 122-127.

Elov, B., Hamroyeva, S., Abdullayeva, O., Husainova, Z., & Xudayberganov, N. (2023). Agglutinativ tillar uchun pos teglash va stemming masalasi (turk, uyg ‘ur, o ‘zbek tillari misolida). Uzbekistan: Language and Culture, 2(2).

Islom, T. (2023). Predloglarning lingvistik tahlili. Innovation: The journal of Social Sciences and Researches, (1), 15-18.

Najmiddinova, N. (2024). Tillarning morfologik (tipologik) tasnifi. Problems and solutions of scientific and innovative research, 1(7), 49-53.

Toxirovna, M. T. (2024). Ingliz va o ‘zbek tillarida yordamchi so ‘zlarning matn hosil qilish xususiyatlari. O'zbekistonda fanlararo innovatsiyalar va ilmiy tadqiqotlar jurnali, 3(33), 319-322.

Багдасарова, Э. В. (2015). Взаимосвязь языковых единиц с экстралингвистическим фоном. Новая наука: от идеи к результату, (1), 68-70.

Валеева, Д. Р. (2009). Репрезентация концепта «Дом» в русской и испанской картинах мира. Ученые записки Казанского университета. Серия Гуманитарные науки, 151(6), 176-182.