This article analyzes the processes of word formation in modern English and Uzbek using the IMRAD model (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusion). The study examined affixation, compounding, conversion, abbreviations, and semantic word-formation methods from typological and functional perspectives. The results showed that in English, conversion and prefixation are highly productive, whereas in Uzbek, due to its agglutinative structure, suffixation plays a leading role. The findings have scientific and practical significance for comparative linguistics, translation studies, and language teaching methodology.

derivatsiya, derivativ jarayon, so‘z yasash, affiks, qiyosiy tilshunoslik, ingliz tili, o‘zbek tili, leksik birlik, morfologiya, sintaksis, agglutinativ xususiyat.

Fitria A. Competency-Based Education in Language Teaching. – Jakarta: Academic Press, 2023. – 256 b.

O.U.Amanbayeva. O‘zbekistonda chet tili ta’limida sun’iy intellekt vositalarini qo‘llash: datlabki kuzatishlar. Yosh olimlar ilmiy-amaliy anjuman materiallari. 106-bet

Biggest Limitations of Artificial Intelligenes Technology/ HackerNoon. (n.d.). Retrieved March 7, 2023, from https://hackernoon.com/the-missing-pieces-6-limitations-of-ai-s85r3upr

Aygun Haciyeva. Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Language Teaching. Euro-Global Journal of Linguistics and Language Education. Vol. 2 No. 5 (2025) Žiema.

Bauer, L. English Word-Formation. Cambridge University Press.

Marchand, H. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. Munich.

Crystal, D. Ingliz tili ensiklopediyasi. Cambridge.

Hojiyev, A. O‘zbek tili so‘z yasalishi. Toshkent.

Rahmatullayev, Sh. Hozirgi o‘zbek tili leksikologiyasi. Toshkent.