Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojp-06-05-09

THE THEMATIC STRUCTURE OF ENGLISH SLANG: DOMAINS OF USE AND NOMINATIVE SOURCES

Bunyodbek Sotvoldiyev ,

Abstract

The article examines the thematic structure of English slang through two independent but interrelated dimensions: the communicative domains in which slang units are used and the semantic fields that supply sources for new slang nominations. The material combines historical records from the author’s working files with 86 units drawn from household vocabulary, anthroponyms, toponyms, zoonyms, phytonyms, somatisms, professional terms, brand names, colour terms and numerals. Descriptive, componential, semantic-field, comparative and quantitative methods distinguish highly, moderately and weakly productive sources. The highly active layer accounts for 54.7 percent of the sample, the moderately active layer for 32.6 percent, and the weakly active layer for 12.8 percent. The findings show that thematic activity depends on community needs, historical period, communicative setting and evaluative strategies. Separating a domain of use from a source of nomination is proposed as a methodological principle for semantic classification and slang lexicography. The model also supports double thematic tagging in electronic dictionaries, translation and corpus research.

Keywords

English slang; thematic structure; nomination; semantic field; sociolect; metaphor; slang lexicography.

References

Adams, M. (2009). Slang: The people’s poetry. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195314632.001.0001

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881

Coleman, J. (2012). The life of slang. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571994.001.0001

Damirjian, A. (2025). The social significance of slang. Mind & Language, 40(2), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12530

Dumas, B. K., & Lighter, J. (1978). Is “slang” a word for linguists? American Speech, 53(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/455336

Eble, C. (1996). Slang and sociability: In-group language among college students. University of North Carolina Press.

Green, J. (2016). Slang: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198729532.001.0001

Green, J. (n.d.). Green’s Dictionary of Slang. Retrieved July 30, 2026, from https://greensdictofslang.com/

Mattiello, E. (2008). An introduction to English slang: A description of its morphology, semantics and sociology. Polimetrica.

Stenström, A.-B., Andersen, G., & Hasund, I. K. (2002). Trends in teenage talk: Corpus compilation, analysis and findings. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.8

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Sotvoldiyev, B. . (2026). THE THEMATIC STRUCTURE OF ENGLISH SLANG: DOMAINS OF USE AND NOMINATIVE SOURCES. Oriental Journal of Philology, 6(05), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojp-06-05-09