Articles
| Open Access |
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/supsci-ojss-05-12-35
IS THINKING DEPENDENT ON LANGUAGE OR LANGUAGE ON THINKING? (SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS)
Zulhumor Sidamatovna Nurullayeva ,Abstract
This article presents a comprehensive philosophical analysis of the relationship between thought and language based on ancient, Islamic, and contemporary scientific sources. It examines the role of language in shaping human thinking, its cognitive, logical, and spiritual influence on the thought process, as well as the independent functions of thinking in relation to language within various philosophical schools. Drawing on the views of thinkers such as Plato, Aristotle, Farabi, Ibn Sina, Wittgenstein, Sapir–Whorf, and Chomsky, the study analyzes three major models explaining the nature of the language–thought relationship: deterministic, universalist, and integrative approaches.
Keywords
: thought, language, belief, cognitive neurophilosophy, integrative model, gnoseology, philosophical analysis, worldview, relationship between language and thought.
References
Aristotle. De Anima. (On the Soul). Trans. by J. Barnes. Oxford University Press, 1986.
Al-Farabi. Kitab al-Burhan (Proof Book). In: Al-Mantiqiyat. Cairo: Dar al-Kutub, 1968.
Ibn Sina. Ash-Shifa. Al-Mantiq. Vol. 1. Cairo: Al-Hay’a al-Misriyya, 1960.
Plato. Cratylus. In: Complete Works. Ed. J. Cooper. Hackett, 1997.
Al-Farabi. Kitab al-Huruf. Ed. M. Mahdi. Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq, 1968.
Wittgenstein, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge, 1921.
Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, 1965.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zulhumor Sidamatovna Nurullayeva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.